Looking for a city-ready cruiser that blends style, performance, and everyday practicality? The Royal Enfield Hunter 350 and Yamaha FZ‑X have emerged as top picks. Each caters to different rider preferences Hunter packs punch and retro charisma, while FZ‑X brings modern tech and fuel efficiency. Let’s compare them head-to-head to help you decide which one’s made for your ride.
Table of Contents
Design & Road Presence
Royal Enfield Hunter 350
- Neo-retro look with a rounded tank, single-piece seat, and a classic round headlamp
- 17-inch alloy wheels with tubeless tyres for superior urban grip
- Upright riding position and low seat height (790 mm) enhance comfort and control
Yamaha FZ‑X
- Neo-scrambler styling inspired by Yamaha’s global XSR design
- LED lighting front and rear, wide handlebars, and a tuck-and-roll seat
- Lightweight construction (139 kg), ideal for new or urban riders
Verdict:
Prefer bold retro visuals and a commanding road presence? Go with the Hunter.
Want a rugged, lightweight, tech-rich design? The FZ‑X takes the lead.
Engine & Performance
| Specification | Hunter 350 | Yamaha FZ‑X |
|---|---|---|
| Engine | 349 cc air‑oil cooled single-cylinder | 149 cc air-cooled SOHC single-cylinder |
| Power | 20.2 bhp @ 6,100 rpm | 12.2–12.4 PS @ 7,250 rpm |
| Torque | 27 Nm @ 4,000 rpm | 13.3 Nm @ 5,500 rpm |
| Gearbox | 5-speed with slip-assist clutch | 5-speed manual |
| Top Speed | ~120 km/h | ~115 km/h |
- Hunter 350 delivers stronger low-end torque—great for overtaking and relaxed cruising.
- FZ‑X is smooth, nimble, and excels in congested city rides.
Verdict:
For power and performance, the Hunter 350 stands out.
For everyday fuel savings and easy control, the FZ‑X shines.
Ride & Handling: City Agility vs Balanced Comfort
Hunter 350
- Telescopic front forks and twin rear shocks offer a balanced, stable ride
- 181 kg weight gives it a planted feel on highways
- Comfortable for both short city trips and longer weekend rides
FZ‑X
- Telescopic 41 mm front forks with a 7-step adjustable rear mono-shock
- Weighs just 139 kg, ensuring quick maneuverability
- Designed for daily city traffic and frequent stops
Verdict:
Prefer highway composure and cruiser-like steadiness? Hunter is your pick.
Need a nimble, traffic-beating companion? FZ‑X takes the win.
Features & Technology – Minimalist Charm vs Modern Connectivity
Hunter 350
- Analogue-digital console with optional Tripper navigation
- USB-C charging port included
- Slip-assist clutch for smoother gear shifts
- Dual-channel ABS on Metro variants; single-channel on Retro variant
FZ‑X
- Fully digital LCD instrument cluster
- Bluetooth connectivity with Y‑Connect app for call alerts and maintenance updates
- LED lighting across the bike
- Optional traction control in newer models
- Side-stand engine cut-off for safety
Verdict:
Love a classic cockpit with essential features? The Hunter is built for you.
Need smartphone sync and tech features on your ride? FZ‑X has you covered.
Price & Value – Which Suits Your Budget?
| Model | Variants | Approx. Ex-Showroom Price |
|---|---|---|
| Hunter 350 | Standard, Metro, Retro | ₹1.50 L to ₹1.82 L |
| Yamaha FZ‑X | Standard, Bluetooth | ₹1.38 L to ₹1.42 L |
- FZ‑X is more affordable and fuel-efficient—great for budget-conscious urban riders
- Hunter 350 justifies its price with better performance, premium build, and wider variant options
Verdict:
Looking for value with tech? Go for the FZ‑X.
Want premium appeal and a solid long-term ride? Choose the Hunter 350.
Which Urban Cruiser Suits You?
Choose Hunter 350 if you want:
- More power for both city and highway use
- Vintage looks with a modern twist
- A premium, balanced cruiser feel
Choose Yamaha FZ‑X if you want:
- Lightweight, fuel-efficient daily commuting
- Modern digital features and connectivity
- A budget-friendly, easy-to-ride machine
FAQs
1. Which bike has better mileage?
- FZ‑X: ~48–55 kmpl
- Hunter 350: ~33–36 kmpl
2. Which one is more comfortable for daily use?
- FZ‑X is lighter and more agile for city rides.
- Hunter is heavier but offers a stable and refined ride experience.
3. Are spare parts easily available?
- Yes. Both Royal Enfield and Yamaha have wide service networks across India.
4. Which bike retains better resale value?
- Hunter 350 is likely to hold value longer due to Royal Enfield’s brand legacy.
5. Do both bikes have ABS?
- Hunter 350 offers dual-channel ABS on Metro variants.
- FZ‑X has single-channel ABS; newer variants may include traction control.
Conclusion: Which Urban Cruiser Wins?
Both the Hunter 350 and FZ‑X bring strong urban cruiser vibes but serve different needs.
- Hunter 350 delivers a bold mix of retro style, higher engine capacity, and long-ride comfort.
- FZ‑X stands out for modern features, fuel efficiency, and ease of city handling.
Your decision depends on what matters most—performance and road presence or tech features and daily convenience.
